La recuperacion del centro: oportunidades de recuperación edilicia en el Centro de Montevideo: la Avenida 18 de Julio y manzanas adyacentes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Al igual que ocurre en otras ciudades, el Centro de Montevideo ha visto desplazada su vitalidad fundacional. La investigación se propuso develar el paisaje de nuestra principal avenida, frente a esta situación de deterioro. Para ello buscó identificar, relevar y analizar las construcciones de las manzanas frentistas a la avenida 18 de Julio entre Plaza Independencia y Ejido. Culmina señalando las oportunidades de inversión en estructuras existentes poniendo a disposición un catálogo de posibles intervenciones para desencadenar un proceso de revitalización del Centro de Montevideo. En la identificación de edificaciones se utilizaron seis categorías analíticas: fósiles, construcciones subutilizadas, baldíos, esqueletos, edificios públicos degradados y galerías, y se definieron tres estrategias: colmatación, recuperación de fósiles y recuperación de galerías. Se identificaron 114 padrones pasibles de la aplicación de alguna de las tres estrategias. Cuando dos o más de estos padrones son linderos se considera que se está frente a una zona de oportunidad, que habilita a transformaciones de mayor impacto. As is the case in other cities, the Downtown of Montevideo has been displaced it foundational vitality. This research aimed to reveal the landscape of our main Avenue, in relation to the situation found, of continuing deterioration. This sought to identify, survey and analyze the constructions belonging to the 18 de Julio Avenue between Plaza Independencia and Ejido street. The work finishes with investment opportunities in existing structures by providing a catalog of possible interventions to trigger a process of revitalization of downtown Montevideo. In identifying buildings used six analytical categories: fossil, underutilized buildings, vacant, skeletons, degraded public buildings and galleries, and defined three strategies: completion, fossil recovery and recovery of galleries. We identified 114 sites where it is possible the implementation of any of the three strategies. When two or more of these sites are boundaries being considered an area of opportunity, which enables high impact changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".