Differential changes in β-adrenoceptor signal transduction in left and right ventricles of infarcted ratsThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special issue, entitled Second Messengers and Phosphoproteins—12th International Conference.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although different experimental and clinical studies have revealed varying degrees of defects in beta-adrenoceptors (beta-ARs) during the development of heart failure, the mechanisms for differences in beta-AR signal transduction between the left (LV) and right ventricle (RV) are not understood. Because biochemical alterations in the myocardium depend on the stage of heart disease, this study was undertaken to assess the status of beta-ARs in the LV and RV at different stages of heart failure. Myocardial infarction was induced in rats by occluding the left coronary artery for 8 and 24 weeks. The beta-AR signal transduction was monitored by measuring beta1-AR density, the isoproterenol-induced positive inotropic effect, the increase in [Ca2+]i in cardiomyocytes, and the activation of adenylyl cyclase. The beta-AR signal transduction parameters in the 8- and 24-week failing LV were depressed, whereas the RV showed upregulation at 8 weeks and downregulation at 24 weeks of these mechanisms. These results suggest that beta-AR-mediated signal transduction in the LV and RV are differentially regulated and are dependent upon the stage of development of congestive heart failure due to myocardial infarction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
| gpt | Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".