Evidence-based physiotherapy for the pelvic floor : bridging science and clinical practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Overview of physiotherapy for pelvic floor dysfunction. 2. Critical appraisal of randomised trials and systematic reviews of the effects of physiotherapy interventions for the pelvic floor. 3. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. 4. Neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of pelvic floor muscles. 5. Measurement of pelvic floor muscle function and strength + pelvic organ prolapse: 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Visual observation and palpation 5.3 Electromyography 5.4 Vaginal squeeze pressure measurement 5.5 Urethral pressure measurements 5.6 Pelvic Floor Dynamometry 5.7 Ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor muscle and pelvic organ descent 5.8 MRI of intact and injured female pelvic floor muscles 5.9 Clinical assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. 6. Pelvic floor and exercise science: 6.1 Motor Learning 6.2 Strength Training. 7. Strategies to enhance adherence and reduce drop out in conservative treatment. 8. Lifestyle interventions for pelvic floor dysfunction. 9. Pelvic floor dysfunction and evidence-based physiotherapy: 9.1 Female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) 9.1.1Prevalence, Causes, Pathphysiology: Two views, one disease 9.1.2 Pelvic floor muscle training for SUI 9.1.3 Electrical stimulation for SUI 9.2 Overactive Bladder (OAB) 9.2.1 Introduction 9.2.2 Bladder training for OAB 9.2.3 Pelvic floor muscle training for OAB 9.2.4 Electrical stimulation for OAB 9.3 Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) 9.3.1 Introduction 9.3.2 Pelvic floor muscle training in the prevention and treatment of POP 9.4 Pelvic Pain 9.4.1 Pelvic floor muscle assessment 9.4.2 Treatment of pelvic floor muscle pain and/or overactivity 9.5 Female Sexual Dysfunction 9.6 Male sexual dysfunction 9.7 Fecal Incontinence. 10. Evidence for pelvic floor physiotherapy for urinary incontinence during pregnancy and after childbirth. 11. Evidence for pelvic floor physiotherapy for neurological diseases: 11.1 Stroke 11.2 Multiple Sclerosis. 12. Evidence for pelvic floor physiotherapy in the elderly. 13. Pelvic floor physiotherapy in elite athletes. 14. Evidence for pelvic floor therapy in men. 15. Evidence for pelvic floor therapy in children. 16.The development of Clinical Practice Guidelines in physiotherapy. Joint Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society (ICS) and International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) 23-27 August, Toronto, 2010 Discover breakthroughs in continence research & treatment from experts in the fields of uro-gynaecology at ICS-IUGA 2010. Register Now: www.ics-iuga.com
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.036 | 0.102 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".