Оценка засухоустойчивости древесных насаждений в Среднем Прихоперье
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The assessment of stability of 28 types of woody plants to high temperatures and a drought in points by method of visual assessment of broken leaves developed by authors is given. Groups of views with various extent of damages are allocated. The aboriginal species of common oak, willow, poplar and arboreal introducents of the Canadian spruce, Colorado spruce, Douglas spruce, Scotch pine, lombardy poplar turned out to be stable to drought and high temperatures. A significant differentiation of leaves crown damage was found with North American species of red ash and ash-leaved maple introduced to culture. The maximum pathologies from heat and drought were found with drooping birch, balsam poplar, grey willow, common elm, horse-chestnut, Norway maple, Tatar maple. The coniferous trees, oak, separate species of poplars and willows are prospective for growing in the Middle Prikhoperye region. In anthropogenic environment the effect of high temperatures and drought on woody plants is increasing. The woody plants of different species were greatly suffered on dacha plots near the town junkyard, in the conditions of the town – in the streets with heavy traffic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".