La enseñanza de la gramática: un debate pendiente en el contexto de la educación argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen En la primera mitad del siglo XX, la enseñanza de la gramática tradicional no se cuestiona y su límite oracional no es un eje de discusión puesto que todavía las líneas de orientación textual estaban en ciernes. Entre los 60 y 70 el estructuralismo eclipsa los estudios del lenguaje y sus herramientas de análisis gramatical ingresan en las aulas. Es en los últimos 20 años cuando aparecen las dos líneas que direccionarán el destino de la gramática en la escuela: no dar gramática o reemplazar la gramática oracional por una lingüística/gramática textual y/o análisis del discurso. En este contexto, el objetivo del presente trabajo es indagar sobre el rol que ocupa la enseñanza de contenidos gramaticales del español en el sistema educativo argentino. Para ello, debemos preguntarnos lo siguiente: ¿existen fundamentos sólidos para eliminar la enseñanza de la gramática? y ¿se puede enseñar gramática textual sin una base en gramática oracional? Para responder a los interrogantes planteados, se utilizará como insumo una encuesta realizada a los estudiantes que ingresan al cursado de la materia Gramática I del Profesorado y la Licenciatura en Letras de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas de la UNLPam (Argentina). En este contexto, las respuestas de los estudiantes se configuran en un aporte sumamente valioso para iluminar el hoy todavía oscuro ámbito de la enseñanza de la gramática en las aulas. Abstract Grammar Teaching: a Pending Debate in the Argentine Education Context During the first half of the twentieth century the teaching of traditional grammar were not questioned, and its limitations to sentence level grammar was not under scrutiny because guidelines for discourse level analysis were still being developed. Between the 60s and 70s, Structuralism eclipsed language studies and its grammatical analysis tools began to be used at school. In the last 20 years two tendencies have oriented the teaching of grammar at school: either by not teaching it at all, or by replacing sentence grammar by lingüistic/text grammar and/or discourse analysis. In this context, this paper aims to investigate the role and the relevance of teaching Spanish grammar content in the Argentine educational system. In order to do so, we should first ask ourselves if there is solid ground to eliminate traditional grammar teaching; and secondly, if it is proper to teach textbook grammar without a sentence grammar basis. So as to answer these questions, we used a survey completed by students attending Gramática I del Profesorado y la Licenciatura en Letras de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas de la UNLPam (Argentina). In this context, the students’ answers have provided an extremely valuable contribution to illuminate the rather dark field of teaching grammar in classrooms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".