MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W598480797

THOUGHTS ON PRIVATISATION, POST 9/11

2002· article· en· W598480797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C McCormick

Bibliographic record

VenueAirports international · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)AviationAir traffic controlGovernment (linguistics)Investment (military)FinanceCapital (architecture)BusinessService (business)Public administrationEngineeringPoliticsPolitical scienceMarketingLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industry leaders comment on advantages and disadvantages of privatizing government-run air navigation service providers (ANSPs). The debate is particularly intense in the U.S. and the U.K. The Bush administration has stepped up the discussion by removing the 'inherently governmental' designation of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). NAV Canada has been overall more efficient and nimble than the FAA, the CEO of Air Canada says, but it also raised rates suddenly to make up for post-9/11 shortfall. The air traffic controllers head points to the rate rise as proof that privatization is a failure. A pro-privatization analyst points out that the FAA has reduced capital investment in long-term programs rather than reduce staff to meet new costs imposed by security needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAirports internationalSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207