MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W598480797

THOUGHTS ON PRIVATISATION, POST 9/11

2002· article· en· W598480797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C McCormick

Bibliographic record

VenueAirports international · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)AviationAir traffic controlGovernment (linguistics)Investment (military)FinanceCapital (architecture)BusinessService (business)Public administrationEngineeringPoliticsPolitical scienceMarketingLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industry leaders comment on advantages and disadvantages of privatizing government-run air navigation service providers (ANSPs). The debate is particularly intense in the U.S. and the U.K. The Bush administration has stepped up the discussion by removing the 'inherently governmental' designation of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). NAV Canada has been overall more efficient and nimble than the FAA, the CEO of Air Canada says, but it also raised rates suddenly to make up for post-9/11 shortfall. The air traffic controllers head points to the rate rise as proof that privatization is a failure. A pro-privatization analyst points out that the FAA has reduced capital investment in long-term programs rather than reduce staff to meet new costs imposed by security needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0420.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAirports internationalSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207