MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W59869760 · doi:10.4000/crm.13146

Frank Klaassen, The Transformations of Magic. Illicit Learned Magic in the Later Middle Ages and Renaissance

2020· article· en· W59869760 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julien Véronèse

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceMAGIC (telescope)ArtMiddle AgesArt historyAncient historyHistoryAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après le volume paru l’an dernier consacré aux pratiques théurgiques médiévales (sous la direction de Claire Fanger), les Presses de l’Université de Pennsylvanie publient dans leur série « Magic in History » une nouvelle pièce importante pour la réévaluation de l’histoire de la magie médiévale et renaissante que l’on doit à un autre grand spécialiste nord-américain, Frank Klaassen (Université de Saskatchewan). L’ouvrage fait le point sur les modalités de circulation et de conservation des tex...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.223
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.096 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistesSame topicReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesFrench-language works237,207