MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W598929536

Passenger Data Management: Third-Party Information Management is Key to the US Registered Traveler Programme

2007· article· en· W598929536 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carroll McCormick

Bibliographic record

VenueAirports international · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpeditingBusinessInteroperabilityClearanceService providerComputer securityService (business)OutsourcingNexus (standard)Transport engineeringEngineeringMarketingComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the new United States Registered Traveler (RT) program in terms of the system’s functioning and its operation, which is mostly handled by the private sector unlike the US-Canada border expediting services NEXUS and FAST. The private organizations, which partner with various airports to provide RT services, must first be cleared by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). The organization that mediates between the private companies and the TSA is the Central Information Management Service (CIMS), which ensures that all providers are interoperable with one another across various airports. CIMS, in turn, has been commissioned by the Transportation Security Clearinghouse (TSC) to monitor all logistical points. RT works by creating a security lane for low-risk passengers (as deemed by a background check). Once such a consumer is in the RT program line, he or she submits biometric information such as a fingerprint or an iris scan to validate their identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAirports internationalSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207