MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W59893176 · doi:10.1093/pch/7.3.139

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder – New diagnostic initiatives

2002· article· en· W59893176 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rachel Greenbaum, Gideon Koren

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFetal alcohol syndromePregnancyMicrocephalyMedicineFetusPediatricsPsychiatryAlcohol intoxicationAlcohol abusePsychologyPoison controlInjury preventionBiologyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Of all forms of substance abuse, alcohol abuse is the most serious in pregnancy, whether judged by its frequency or capacity to harm the fetus (1). Prenatal alcohol exposure is the most prevalent, single cause of intellectual impairment in children in the western world (2,3). Although alcohol's role in human teratogenicity was not systematically studied until the 1970s, adverse effects of alcohol consumption during pregnancy have been noted throughout history, dating back to the Bible and Greek history (4). The first scientific study of children of alcoholic mothers was conducted by a British physician, Dr William Sullivan, in 1899. However, until the past few decades, little attention was paid to the plausibility of alcohol being a teratogen. In 1968, an article in France by Lemoine and Lemoine (5) provided the first description in the medical literature of the effects of alcohol on the fetus. Jones and Smith (6) coined the term ‘fetal alcohol syndrome’ (FAS) in 1973, after recognizing a distinct dysmorphic syndrome associated with gestational alcoholism. The criteria for the diagnosis of FAS is based on the presence of the following: evidence of excessive maternal drinking during pregnancy; characteristic facial dysmorphology (ie, microcephaly, poorly developed philtrum, thin upper lip and flattened maxillary area); pre-and/or postnatal growth retardation (weight, length and/or height below the 10th percentile); and central nervous system (CNS) damage (signs of neurological abnormality, developmental delay, intellectual impairment or neurobehavioural anomalies) (4). However, very few alcohol-exposed children present with the full-blown syndrome, especially with all the facial features listed for FAS. Moreover, of the dysmorphic characteristics listed, most are not ‘disfiguring’, and in fact, many lead to appealing or attractive-looking faces. Further, these facial features often tend to fade with age and may become undetectable in adolescence (7,8), whereas the associated CNS damage is life-long and debilitating. Full-blown FAS encompasses a relatively small proportion of children prenatally affected by alcohol (9,10). It is estimated that only 10% to 40% of the offspring of alcohol-abusing women meet the criteria necessary for a diagnosis of FAS (11). As a consequence, the term ‘alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder’ (ARND) is used to describe the large number of children affected by prenatal alcohol exposure who do not fit all of the criteria for a diagnosis of full-blown FAS (1). The combined incidence of fetal alcohol-related abnormalities has been estimated to be about 0.91% in the general population and up to 10% to 20% of the population in some Native communities in which drinking in pregnancy is a common lifestyle activity (12). A slightly more conservative estimate of one to three children in a general obstetric population of 1000 was reported by Korkman et al (3) for European communities. The incidence of FAS appears to vary both within and between countries, and was reported to be more than 20 times higher in the United States than in other countries (13). In 1996, the National Institute of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, formally established the diagnostic criteria for ARND (1). These criteria include a history of prenatal alcohol exposure in conjunction with the following. There is evidence of CNS neurodevelopmental abnormalities, including any of the following: — decreased cranial size at birth; — structural brain abnormalities (ie, microcephaly, partial or complete agenesis of the corpus callosum, cerebellar hypoplasia); and — neurological hard or soft signs such as impaired fine motor skills, neurosensory hearing loss, poor tandem gait and poor eye-hand coordination. There is evidence of a complex pattern of behaviour or of cognitive abnormalities that are inconsistent with the child's developmental level, and they cannot be explained by familial background or by the environment alone. These factors include the following: —learning difficulties and deficits in school performance; —poor impulse control; —problems in social perception; —deficits in higher level receptive and expressive language; —poor capacity for abstraction or metacognition; —specific deficits in mathematical skills; and —problems in memory, attention or judgment. In the following section, some of the major challenges are reviewed that are related to the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), and that are relevant to the context of paediatric medicine in Canada and other countries. Despite the establishment of the Institute of Medicine guidelines, diagnostic issues are far from resolved. The absence of pathognomonic facial characteristics in the majority of fetal alcohol-affected children makes identification of the disorder extremely difficult. According to Sampson and colleagues (14), The problem with the FAS face as an indicator of fetal alcohol affected individuals, is poor sensitivity; there are too many false negatives, that is, affected individuals without the FAS face characteristics who are thus often not identified. Furthermore, a misconception exists that FAS is on the extreme negative end of a continuum, with ARND representing relatively less negative effects. However, this does not seem to be the case. A longitudinal analysis by Steinhausen et al (15) refuted earlier evidence (16), and showed no linear relationship between the degree of morphological damage and intelligence. This analysis suggests that ARND is a significant disorder in its own right, whether like or distinct from FAS. In a study comparing children with histories of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure who had defining physical dysmorphology, Mattson et al (17) found significant neuropsychological deficits in both groups, regardless of whether physical features were present. Recently, a number of studies have extended these findings to other cognitive domains, and to aspects of behavioural, adaptive and social functioning, confirming that the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure can be as devastating for children with ARND as for children with FAS (18). In a recent physician survey conducted by the Motherisk Program, most physicians expressed a need to know more about diagnosing this disorder (19). In response to this need, a new national program has been developed to train and certify physicians in the detection and diagnosis of FASD. The program entails a 4-h course that delivers continuing medical education; certification is given after participants have submitted an analysis of two cases. An important pillar of this course was the development of the Handbook for the Diagnosis of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (20). In many remote areas of Canada, it is unrealistic to expect children to be mobilized to the few existing clinics in large cities to be given a diagnosis of FAS. The only realistic way to diagnose them is through telemedicine. Presently, the University of Manitoba operates a telediagnosis program with Thompson, Manitoba (Chudley A; personal communication, 2001). A telediagnosis program is being planned that will be based on the ability of physicians certified by the Motherisk program to send to us by mail, by web or through telemedicine all data needed for diagnosis, and the Motherisk team will interact and corroborate the diagnosis of FASD with the local teams across the country. A critical prerequisite for the diagnosis of FAS is documentation of maternal drinking (1). Due to litiginous fears, fear of loosing a child, shame and embarrassment, women often refrain from reporting their drinking habits during pregnancy. This reality reinforces the need for a biological marker of maternal drinking that is independent of maternal reporting. Over the past few years, the Motherisk team has developed the use of fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) as markers of fetal exposure to alcohol. These esters are produced by enzymatic interaction between ethanol and circulating fatty acids, and have been shown to reflect heavy maternal drinking (21). The Motherisk program is presently examining the feasibility of using meconium FAEE as a screening test for intrauterine exposure to ethanol (22). Because meconium begins to form at around 14 weeks' gestation, the presence of FAEE in meconium reflects maternal drinking taking place long after most mothers have become aware of their pregnancy, and hence, it shows alcohol dependence and a high probability for FASD. These projects are supported by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario; The Brewers' Association of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario; and The Research Leadership in Better Pharmacotherapy During Pregnancy and Lactation, Toronto, Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207