MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W600021514 · doi:10.20361/g2hs4r

Dorothy Must Die by D. Paige

2015· article· en· W600021514 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rachelle Buch-Goncalves

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Deakin Review of Children s Literature · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlMAGIC (telescope)Art historyAdventureArtDreamFace (sociological concept)HumanitiesSociologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paige, D. Dorothy Must Die. Full Fathom Five: Harper Collins, 2014. Print.Once you enter Oz there is no turning back. Be Brave. Be Angry. Don’t trust anyone. Trust yourself. You’ll know what to do. Danielle Paige takes the classic tale of the Wizard of Oz and twists the characters with evil to leave the reader anxiously waiting for the next magical revelation in her novel Dorothy Must Die.As an average teen from a trailer park in Kansas, Amy Gumm believes that the realities of her mother’s addiction, an absent father and the bully at school are the worst scenario a girl could face. She couldn’t be more wrong. The collision of a classic tale with the magic and horror that Amy requires to fulfill her destiny forms a novel that is a fast paced adventure along the yellow brick road. Amy considers the storm rolling in on her life in the trailer park, and the possibility of life as someone other than Salvation Amy: Bring it on. There’s no place like anywhere but here. When she is swept away in the tornado and lands in the Land of Oz she is met with something more sinister than she can imagine. It turns out that all Amy finds in this new version of Oz has been created by her predecessor Dorothy, the other girl from Kansas. With acts of evil and desperation, Dorothy's attempt to harness all magic and power over the land have caused desolation. With such a dismal reality for the Land of Oz, Amy is recruited by the Revolutionary Order of the Wicked with a single mission: Dorothy must die.As Amy asks the question “Who am I supposed to be?” she deals with her haunting past back home, her identity as a teen, lessons in managing magic, and ultimately her role as an assassin. But Dorothy has clearly declared that there can only be one, and both Amy and Dorothy intend for that one to be them. In Danielle Paige's debut as a YA writer she creates a tornado in its own right, carrying the reader up and away only to drop them on their head when the storm dies down. Oz - Where all your worst nightmares can come true.Highly Recommended: 4 out of 4 starsReviewer: Rachelle Buch-GoncalvesRachelle is the Teacher Librarian at Southern Okanagan Secondary School in Oliver, BC. She is currently completing her Masters degree in Teacher Librarianship and enjoys sharing her studies with her colleagues, students, and her two young daughters who are reading ‘just like mom’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3840.266

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Deakin Review of Children s LiteratureSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207