MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W600321068 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2007.0021

Sodom on the Thames: Sex, Love and Scandal in Wilde Times by Morris B. Kaplan (review)

2007· article· en· W600321068 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Matt Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirValue (mathematics)FantasyArt historyFace (sociological concept)HistoryPeriod (music)ArtSociologyLiteratureAestheticsSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

141 Reviews Sodom on theThames: Sex,Love and Scandal inWildeTimes by Morris B. Kaplan; pp. 314. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2005. $42.60 cloth. Sodom on theThames revisits three well-known late nineteenth-century scandals in London: the case of cross-dressers Ernest Boulton and Frederick Park, also known as Fanny and Stella (1870–71); the exposure of the Cleveland Street male brothel (1889–90); and the trials of Oscar Wilde (1895). In addition it looks at the relationships that lay behindWilliam Johnson’s resignation from Eton in 1871 and at how they endured well beyond that date. These dramatic episodes (they are nicely flagged as such with a list of dramatis personae at the start of each section) are framed by two very different texts from the period—John Addington Symonds’s frank but earnest Memoirs (written between 1889 and 1893) and the pornographic novel Sins of the Cities of the Plain (1881).These serve as points of reference throughout, allowing Kaplan to illustrate the intersection of urban possibility and homoerotic fantasy in his case studies and also to draw out the ways in which men tried differently to understand and validate their loves and desires. At face value this project may not appear particularly new—the case studies and texts are now fairly familiar—and yet Kaplan’s attention to detail and skillful story telling yield fresh insights. His characters gain shape and substance, and we begin to see more clearly than before how the particularities of class, family, and desire play out in an individual’s lives and loves. I have never before been affected by Lord Arthur Somerset’s devastating exile as a result of the Cleveland Street scandal, and neither have I distinguished him particularly from Lord Euston, the other aristocratic figure embroiled in the scandal.They were both to me simply privileged aristocrats. Fanny and Stella had likewise been almost interchangeable in my mind, but here their differences emerge clearly. Kaplan has the ability to pull out an apparently incidental detail and make it count. He points, for example, to the subdued manner of the pair in court one morning, and we suddenly see beyond the exuberant campery of the tale and glimpse the distress and pressure these two men must have been under— especially after the death of Stella’s lover, Lord Arthur Clinton. The story of Fanny and Stella also opens out questions of just how these two men understood themselves—specifically, how they understood themselves differently from Johnson, who resigned from Eton in the same year as the trial over his “boy love,” and from Symonds, who was struggling around this time to comprehend the electrifying effect queer urban graffiti and solicitous guardsmen had upon him.“Even today,” Kaplan concludes,“it is not easy to say whether Boulton and Park acted on homosexual desires or whether they are better understood as expressing a transgendered refusal of normative masculinity” (266). It is an important point; Fanny and Stella and others like them have tended to be subsumed in the history of homosexuality and the emergence of a homosexual “type” (too often seen as singular). victorian review • Volume 33 Number 1 142 Such explicit critical insights come late in Sodom on the Thames. “The heart of this book,” writes Kaplan, “is its characters and their stories. I have allowed them to speak for themselves as much as possible” (6). This sidelining of analysis is a canny strategy. Unfolding each story with such care means that by the end, the conclusions seem self-evident; I found myself simply nodding as the key findings were laid out in the epilogue. The approach could easily have backfired: focusing so tightly on these cases might have suggested a banal and transhistorical individualism. Kaplan, however, is careful to keep a keen eye on the social, cultural, and material circumstances of these men’s lives, and also to resist conflating the past with the present. He thus describes what he sees as a “broader erotic life” at play in his period. He notes, for example, how the 1992 reworking of Sins of the City of the Plain writes out its original “polymorphous pansexuality and gender fuck” (223...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicLiterature: history, themes, analysisFrench-language works237,207