MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W60054199 · doi:10.13033/ijahp.v5i2.212

AHP News: X OPTIMA & VI RED-M Conference Highlights

2013· article· en· W60054199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Valentina Ferretti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Technological Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytic hierarchy processOperations researchPolitical scienceRegional scienceLibrary scienceGeographyComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Last October, two important events took place in Concepción, Chile. From the 27th to the 30th of October the University of Concepción hosted the 10thBiennial Conference of the Chilean Institute of Operations Research (OPTIMA), and the 6thMeeting of the Ibero-American Network on Multi-criteria Decision (RED-M). This year the events attracted about 120 participants, 30% of which were students, coming from Belgium, Italy, Spain, USA, Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Brazil and Chile.http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v5i2.212

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1560.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessSame topicEconomic and Technological InnovationFrench-language works237,207