MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W60054199 · doi:10.13033/ijahp.v5i2.212

AHP News: X OPTIMA & VI RED-M Conference Highlights

2013· article· en· W60054199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Valentina Ferretti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Technological Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytic hierarchy processOperations researchPolitical scienceRegional scienceLibrary scienceGeographyComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Last October, two important events took place in Concepción, Chile. From the 27th to the 30th of October the University of Concepción hosted  the 10thBiennial Conference of the Chilean Institute of Operations Research (OPTIMA), and the 6thMeeting of the Ibero-American Network on Multi-criteria Decision (RED-M). This year the events attracted about 120 participants, 30% of which were students, coming from Belgium, Italy, Spain, USA, Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Brazil and Chile.http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v5i2.212

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessSame topicEconomic and Technological InnovationFrench-language works237,207