MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W602556561 · doi:10.2140/pjm.2008.236.1

ℤ<sub>2</sub>× ℤ<sub>2</sub>-symmetric spaces

2008· article· en· W602556561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Journal of Mathematics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The notion of a -symmetric space is a generalization of the classical notion of a symmetric space, where a general finite abelian group replaces the group ‫ޚ‬ 2 .We approach the classification of -symmetric space in the case = ‫ޚ‬ 2 × ‫ޚ‬ 2 using recent results on the classification of complex ‫ޚ‬ 2 × ‫ޚ‬ 2graded simple Lie algebras.The notion of a -symmetric space, introduced by R. Lutz [1981], is a generalization of the classical notion of a symmetric space, where a general finite abelian group replaces the group ‫ޚ‬ 2 .The case = ‫ޚ‬ k has also been studied, from the algebraic point of view by V. Kac [1968] and from the point of view of differential geometry by Ledger and Obata [1968], by Kowalski [1980] or by Wolf and Gray [1968] in terms of k-symmetric spaces.In this case, a k-manifold is a homogeneous reductive space and the classification of these varieties is given by the corresponding classification of graded Lie algebras.We approach the classification of -symmetric spaces in the case = ‫ޚ‬ 2 ‫ޚ×‬ 2 in a similar way, using recent results (see [Bahturin et al. 2005]) on the classification of complex ‫ޚ‬ 2 ‫ޚ×‬ 2 -graded simple Lie algebras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it