MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W603144386 · doi:10.33593/iccp.v10i1.403

Alberta Transportation’s First Concrete Pavement Preservation and Rehabilitation Project

2025· article· en· W603144386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Márta Juhász, Jim Gavin, Mike Gerlinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Concrete Pavements · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationTransport engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringForensic engineeringMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2010, Alberta Transportation completed its first concrete pavement preservation and rehabilitation project on Highway 1 through Medicine Hat. Preservation and rehabilitation were seen as the best options to treat the sections of concrete due to their existing condition and constraining infrastructure and despite the fact that the initial design was for an asphalt overlay. Given that Alberta Transportation owns few concrete pavements and has little experience with concrete pavement preservation or rehabilitation, this project presented numerous unique challenges. These included treatment option identification, treatment design and specification development. The treatments that were ultimately used included diamond grinding, dowel bar retrofit and cross-stitching. The project involved undertaking these treatments while maintaining traffic on this busy section of the Trans-Canada highway. This paper will discuss the details of this project from initiation to treatment selection to design and construction. Performance of the treatments to date will also be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Concrete PavementsSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207