MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W603999202

Women and electoral politics in Canada

2003· book· en· W603999202 on OpenAlex
Manon Tremblay, Linda Trimble

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsParliamentLegislaturePolitical scienceNewspaperFeminization (sociology)PopularityContext (archaeology)Gender studiesPublic administrationSociologyLawGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"In Women and Electoral Politics in Canada, Manon Tremblay and Linda Trimble bring together critical analyses from scholars across the country to explore women's place in Canada's electoral politics, past and present - and how that place might be changed in the future. Thirteen chapters address topics in four general areas: the electoral system and the women who have been elected to office within it; women and political parties; the values and attitudes of voters; and media coverage of women politicians. Specific subjects range from socio-demographic profiles of women who have stood for office since the winning of suffrage in 1917, to the feminization of Quebec politics, gender differences in political beliefs, and the media's treatment of the various party leaders in the 2000 federal election."--BOOK JACKET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGender Politics and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207