MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W604195472 · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2015.05.013

Exosome release following activation of the dendritic cell immunoreceptor: A potential role in HIV-1 pathogenesis

2015· article· en· W604195472 on OpenAlexafffund
Claude Mukeba Mfunyi, Myriam Vaillancourt, Julien Vitry, Thy-René Nsimba Batomene, Alma Posvandzic, Alexandra A. Lambert, Caroline Gilbert

Bibliographic record

VenueVirology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMicrovesiclesExosomeCell biologyBiologyApoptosisRaji cellExtracellular vesicleAntibodyImmunologyBiochemistrymicroRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exosomes are extracellular vesicles (EVs) that play a role in intercellular communication. Stimulation of dendritic cells by the HIV-1 virus triggers their release. HIV-1 binds to dendritic cells via dendritic cell immunoreceptor (DCIR). This study shows that inhibiting the binding to DCIR significantly decreases exosome release by HIV-1-pulsed dendritic cells. In addition, exosome release from Raji-CD4 expressing DCIR cells stimulated by anti-DCIR or HIV-1 is decreased when the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM) signaling motif of DCIR is mutated. Unlike the EVs released from Raji-CD4-DCIR cells after antibody stimulation, those released from HIV-1-infected cells contain the pro-apoptotic protein DAP-3. Furthermore, EVs from HIV-1 pulsed dendritic cells increase spontaneous apoptosis in uninfected CD4 T lymphocytes while they decrease it in neutrophils. This study describes for the first time that DCIR plays a role in the release of exosomes strengthening the importance of this receptor and EVs/exosomes in HIV-1 pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVirologySame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207