MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W60425295

Why a registered nurse (RN) in the OR? The perioperative registered nurse role--a well kept secret.

2007· article· en· W60425295 on OpenAlexaff
Muriel Shewchuk

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHIV Legal Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerioperative nursingPerioperativeNursingRegistered nurseSurgical nursingMedicineHealth careMedical emergencyNurse educationPrimary nursingSurgeryPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The above description of the circulating Registered Nurse is only a brief over view of the detailed and complex world of perioperative nursing. Unveiling the vital, "well kept secret", of the need for a Registered Nurse, circulating at all times throughout the surgical procedure, is critical for safe patient care. The health care system is responsible, and accountable to the public, for the provision of a hospital environment that is safe for all patients and personnel. The operating theatre is the prime unit of care, in the OR, and must have the resources in the room to fully complete the intended surgery and to prepare for changes and complications that may arise. The critical thinking, clinical decision making, systems approach, and reflective high-level practice, creates a requirement that the circulating role must be filled by a Registered Nurse. A skilled perioperative Registered Nurse must be in charge of each theatre, any group of theatres, each OR shift and the OR Department. Every perioperative nurse needs to explain, be proud of, and to market the importance of the role outside the walls of the OR to the "world".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→