MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W604587274

Thickwood Interchange and Highway 63 Tangent Pile Wall

2012· article· en· W604587274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F Bhanji, L Seto

Bibliographic record

Venue2012 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: INNOVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoulevardTransport engineeringEngineeringDowntownIntersection (aeronautics)Civil engineeringTraffic volumeGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Thickwood Boulevard Interchange is being constructed in conjunction with the Highway 63:11 Corridor improvements through Fort McMurray to accommodate extremely high volumes of local and commuter traffic, in addition to overdimensioned vehicles going to the oil sands through this very constrained corridor. The Hwy 63:11 corridor improvement involves a combination of grade widening and new construction of 9.5km of freeway, from 4 to 6 lanes, and the construction of C-D lanes (1 to 3 lanes)from downtown to Confederation Way. When complete there will also be 3 new bridges constructed across the Athabasca River which will provide a total of 10 lanes of traffic. AECOM was retained by Alberta Transportation to provide preliminary engineering, detail design, tender preparation, construction supervision, contract administration and post-construction services for the Thickwood Boulevard Interchange in Fort McMurray. This involves converting the existing at-grade signalized intersection to a trumpet interchange to facilitate the high volume northbound left turn movement which is currently handled by a 3-lane dedicated left turn bay. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record numbre 201211RT334E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2012 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF CANADA - TRANSPORTATION: INNOVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIESSame topicTunneling and Rock MechanicsFrench-language works237,207