Bibliographic record
Abstract
In keeping with the policy direction and objectives laid out in its Public Transit Strategic Development Plan – Vision 2020, the Metropolitan Transportation Agency (Agence metropolitaine de transport – AMT) unveiled its first Velostation on July 2, 2013. With this pilot project, The AMT is looking to further encourage the use alternative modes of transportation (as opposed to the ‘solo automobile’) to travel to and from AMT stations and facilities. To do so, it has opted to improve the facilities for those who travel by bicycle to and from AMT stations and terminals. As part of this initiative, the AMT built the Montreal Metropolitan Region’s first Velostation at the Deux-Montagnes Station, which serves the commuter rail line of the same name. The Velostation is a state of the art, controlled access, weather-protected bicycle parking facility available to commuter train users. This pilot project generated considerable interest among the cycling population as soon as it was announced. The community of Deux-Montagnes, with an extensive existing bike path network and a history of supporting bicycle use among its citizens, proved to be the ideal location for the first Velostation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".