MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W605229657 · doi:10.4324/9780203044117

The Internationalisation of Retailing

2013· book· en· W605229657 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternationalizationBusinessEconomic geographyGeographyInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The internationalization process in retailing, Gary Akehurst and Nicholas Alexander a conceptual model of strategic considerations for international retail expansion, Eithel M. Simpson and Dayle I. Thorpe towards a taxonomy of international retail alliances, Jayne Bayley, Colin M. Clarke-Hill and Terry M. Robinson the changing process of internationalization in the European Union, Hayley Myers reciprocal retail internationalization - the Southland Corporation, Ito-Yokado and 7-Eleven convenience stores, Leigh Sparks the international activities of Japanese retailers, Yung-Fang Chen and Brenda Sternquist international comparisons of supply chain management in grocery retailing, John Fernie the planning implications of new retail format introductions in Canada and Britain Alan G. Hallsworth, Ken G. Jones and Russell Muncaster retailing in Canada and the United States - historical comparisons, David J. Burns and Dale M. Rayman consumer behaviour convergence in the European Union, Barry J. Davies and Malene Flemmer the internationalization of retailing in the Czech and Slovak republics, Tomas Drtina developing a framework for the study of the internationalization of retailing, Gary Akehurst and Nicholas Alexander.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207