Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Introduction Part I Theoretical Approaches and Overview: Three stages of feminist legal theory, Martha Chamallas Feminist theories and international law, Hilary Charlesworth and Christine Chinkin Feminist legal theory and understandings of equality: one step forward or two steps back?, Reg Graycar and Jenny Morgan Power and danger: feminist engagement with international law through the UN Security Council, Dianne Otto Naming gender stereotyping, Rebecca J. Cook and Simone Cusack EU gender equality law, Susanne Burri and Sacha Prechal. Part II Gender: Multiple and Complex Identities: Theorizing yes: an essay on feminism, law and desire, Katherine Franke New complexity theories: from theoretical innovation to doctrinal reform, Darren Lenard Hutchinson The transgender rights imaginary, Paisley Currah Theorizing class, gender and the law: three approaches, Angela P. Harris. Part III Family: Transracial adoption: mothers, hierarchy, race, and feminist legal theory, Twila L. Perry Whoa (TM)s afraid of polygamy? Exploring the boundaries of family, equality and custom in South Africa, Penelope E. Andrews Compulsory matrimony, Ruthann Robson. Part IV Work: Leave - Work/Family: Work, caregiving, and masculinities, Ann C. McGinley Work/family reconciliation, equal opportunities and social policies: the interpretation of policy trajectories at the EU level and the meaning of gender equality, Jane Lewis. Low-Wage Workers: The four-day work week: but what about Ms Coke, Ms Upton, and Ms Blankenship?, Shirley Lung Conclusion: the limits of labour law, Elsje Bonthuys. Sexual Harassment: The sanitized workplace revisited, Vicki Schultz. Sex Work and Trafficking: Migrant women and the legal politics of anti-trafficking interventions, Ratna Kapur. Part V Reproductive Rights: Creating and solving the problem of drug use during pregnancy, Dorothy E. Roberts Sex equality arguments for reproductive rights: their critical basis and evolving constitutional expression, Reva B. Siegel The global reproductive health and rights agenda: opportunities and challenges for the future, Laura Reichenbach. Part VI Violence: The violence of privacy, Elizabeth M. Schneider Violence against women as sex discrimination (VAW=SD): evaluating a feminist strategy, Alice Edwards Rethinking anti-violence strategies: lessons from the Black womena (TM)s movement in Britain, Julia Sudbury Compounding the triple jeopardy: battering in lesbian of color relationships, Valli Kalei Kanuha End torture, end domestic violence, Rhonda Copelon The duty to protect women from sexual violence in South Africa, Sibongile Ndashe Disjunctures between global law and local justice, Sally Engle Merry Name index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".