Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geometric methods: Mixed toric residues and Calabi-Yau complete intersections by V. V. Batyrev and E. N. Materov Crepant resolutions of $\mathbb{C}^n/A_1(n)$ and flops of $n$-folders for $n=4,5$ by L. Chiang and S.-s. Roan Picard-Fuchs equations, integrable systems and higher algebraic K-theory by P. L. del Angel and S. Muller-Stach Counting BPS states via holomorphic anomaly equations by S. Hosono Regulators of Chow cycles on Calabi-Yau varieties by J. D. Lewis Arithmetic methods: Calabi-Yau manifolds over finite fields, II by P. Candelas, X. de la Ossa, and F. Rodriguez-Villegas Modularity of rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds over $\mathbb{Q}$ by L. Dieulefait and J. Manoharmayum $K3$ surfaces with symplectic group actions by Y. Goto Birational smooth minimal models have equal Hodge numbers in all dimensions by T. Ito The $n$th root of the mirror map by B. H. Lian and S.-T. Yau On a Shioda-Inose structure of a family of K3 surfaces by L. Long Black hole attractor varieties and complex multiplication by M. Lynker, V. Periwal, and R. Schimmrigk Hypergeometric families of Calabi-Yau manifolds by F. Rodriguez-Villegas Aspects of conformal field theory from Calabi-Yau arithmetic by R. Schimmrigk Ordinary Calabi-Yau-3 crystals by J. Stienstra The ordinary limit for varieties over $\mathbb{Z}[x_1,\ldots,x_r]$ by J. Stienstra Update on the modularity of Calabi-Yau varieties with appendix by Helena Verrill by N. Yui Problems by N. Yui and J. D. Lewis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it