MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W607240472

Rotated-Ellipse Arch Pedestrian Bridge for the Calgary West Light Rail Transit Extension Project

2014· article· fr· W607240472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eanson Ho, M Knaus

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Engineering and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatenaryArchEllipseEngineeringSpan (engineering)Bridge (graph theory)Structural engineeringPedestrianCivil engineeringGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the Calgary West Light Rail Transit (LRT) project, the existing pedestrian overpass crossing Bow Trail SW, west of 24th Street SW, was replaced to provide a widened roadway and LRT right-of-way. An increase in vertical clearance was also necessary for the LRT power propulsion system catenary wires. The project-wide architectural concept of a rotated ellipse was incorporated into the bridge design through the ellipse shaped arches with the pipe components rotated by 10 degrees. The two pipe arches were also inclined inwards to further enhance the aesthetics. The bridge utilizes pipe arch as the main structural members, providing a main span length of over 50 m and a top-of-arch height of approximately 16m. The north abutment continues the elliptical theme by carrying the curve design through the exposed portion of the arch foundation wall. This paper presents the opportunities and challenges experienced throughout design, fabrication, erection and construction. The design had a focus on engineering solutions developed by the design-build team to minimize potential risks during construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du CanadaSame topicRailway Engineering and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207