The road challenge network and public transit - the complementary challenge in greater Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mission of the Agence Metropolitaine de Transport (AMT) is to facilitate commuting in the greater Montreal region by fostering a modal shift from automobile transport to public transit. In a situation of ever-increasing traffic congestion and automobile ownership, the AMT is especially interested in deploying a highly reliable express metropolitan bus service. As the reserved lanes for metropolitan bus service are not fully networked yet, many of the bus lines are running into traffic congestion, which increases transit time and makes them less competitive with automobile commuting. Instituting reserved lanes is an effective solution— one that is sure to increase the efficiency of commuting on the public road network. As outlined in its 2011-2020 strategic plan, the AMT would like to install a rapid-transit bus network based on the implementation of reserved lanes and other priority measures. Some thirty major arteries potentially able to accommodate bus rapid transit (BRT) will be recommended for the greater Montreal region overall. For all corridors, committees will be formed which will work in partnership on the identification of needs, the definition of service solutions and the development of the final project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".