Charles Marville: Photographer of Paris <i>Charles Marville: Photographer of Paris</i> . Catalogue of the exhibition held at National Gallery of Art (Washington), Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), and National Gallery of Canada (Ottawa), 2013–14. By S <scp>arah</scp> K <scp>ennel</scp> , with A <scp>nne de</scp> M <scp>ondenard</scp> , P <scp>eter</scp> B <scp>arberie</scp> , F <scp>rançoise de</scp> R <scp>eynaud</scp> , and J <scp>oke de</scp> W <scp>olf</scp> . Washington, DC:Publishing Office, National Gallery of Art in association with Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014. xi + 265 pp., ill.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accompanying the Washington National Gallery of Art's ambitious retrospective exhibition centred on the almost thirty-year photographic career of Charles Marville (pseudonym of Charles-François Bossu, 1813–1879), this catalogue offers visual delight and fascinating insights through comprehensive and stimulating essays that complement each other admirably. Curator and editor Sarah Kennel's opening chapter provides an illuminating synthesis of the photographer's life and work: from the revelation of his identity to his education and career as illustrator, and the influence of this on his approach to photography, the chapter foregrounds the creation of a persona — Marville. The photographer's versatility and resourcefulness match his ‘professional aspirations and understanding of the image trade’ (p. 12). The breadth of Marville's contribution to photographic history emerges through his innovations and experiments with subjects and technology alike. Importantly, in her discussion of the treatment of urban space, Kennel corrects the misconception of the photographer's work ‘as part of an official discourse of modernization’ and his image as ‘Haussmann's advance man’ (p. 29), restoring auctorial agency by highlighting Marville's engagement with the city. In the second essay Anne de Mondenard explores the early works, emphasizing Marville's inquisitive, enterprising nature and his penchant for invention through a discussion of the range of experiments he undertook in the photographic medium. Of particular interest is the study of previously unpublished calotypes from the Commission des monuments historiques collection. The degree to which Marville experimented stylistically and conceptually comes through in his transformation of the city into a stage-set (p. 157), and light and shade into structural elements (p. 159). Examining Marville's ‘approach to seriality’, the chapter invites a reappraisal of its role in the history of photography and art (p. 167). Peter Barberie discusses Marville's pioneering dialogue with the landscape genre with reference to his series on the ‘newly renovated bois de Boulogne’: as the ‘first municipal project’ (p. 171), it marks a turning point in his commissions under the Second Empire. Barberie aptly parallels Marville's foregrounding of a different ‘pictorial experience’, which would subsequently define street photography of the 1860s, with how it responds to the hybrid park-landscape, interrogating its relation to ‘old conventions, both social and aesthetic’ (p. 187). Françoise Reynaud's study of the Old Paris series is notable for its focus on the commissioning of the urban photographs. Among the reasons and uses for the corpus, she remarks that the pictures were not ‘designed to illustrate the old city's dilapidated and unsanitary state’ (p. 195). Instead, a conjectural reading reveals their role in remapping Old Paris following the Commune's destruction of the city's topographical surveys. Joke de Wolf then analyses the Universal Exhibitions' relationship with photography, and Marville's role therein. From ideological discourse to reconstruction aids, the photographs showcase not only the city's rebirth but also, ultimately, the 1878 Paris Exhibition itself. High-quality, full-page reproductions, some in colour, and a wealth of other views capture the masterful effects that Marville achieved by using different techniques and supports. The five studies reveal a uniquely complex figure, exploring the stylistic and conceptual implications at stake in Marville's projects, with well-researched contextual information and in-depth readings of form and content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".