MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W60940071 · doi:10.2527/2000.78123114x

The activity of transcription factor Stat5 responds to prolactin, growth hormone, and IGF-I in rat and bovine mammary explant culture.

2000· article· en· W60940071 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Yang, J.J. Kennelly, Vickie E. Baracos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSTAT5ProlactinBiologySTAT proteinHormoneTranscription factorInternal medicineExplant cultureEndocrinologySignal transductionCell biologySTAT3GeneIn vitroBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signal transducer and activator of transcription-5 (Stat5) is known to play a critical role in prolactin-induced beta-casein gene transcription in rodents. In nonmammary cells, Stat5 is activated by multiple hormones and cytokines, including growth hormone. We hypothesized that Stat5 may serve as a common point in the signal transduction pathways of hormones that promote milk protein gene expression in bovine mammary cells, which are regulated by GH and IGF-I in addition to prolactin. Assays for Stat5 DNA binding activity and protein were validated in mammary explant culture. The Stat5 protein abundance was not changed by any of the short-term hormonal treatments used in our study, suggesting that short-term regulation of Stat5 is predominantly at the level of protein activation. Both rat and bovine explant culture showed a rapid stimulation of Stat5 DNA binding activity by prolactin, GH, and IGF-I at the high concentrations typically used in explant cultures as well as at levels within physiologic ranges. Growth hormone stimulated Stat5 activity at a lower concentration in bovine than in rat cultures, but in both species the presence of GH increased the response of Stat5 activity to prolactin. These results suggest that transcription factor Stat5 may represent part of a common route by which different extracellular signals converge and are transduced intracellularly to coordinately regulate cell function in the mammary gland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207