Conscience verte et éducation au Burkina Faso « Nous abandonnons cela en soulevant les seaux »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine l’intégration d’une « conscience verte » chez les élèves d’écoles primaires en fonction de deux types d’éducation : bilingue ou unilingue. Dix des anciens interviewés sont diplômés de l’école unilingue, dont le curriculum est né pendant la colonisation, tandis que les dix autres sont allés à l’école bilingue où savoirs, savoir-faire et langues autochtones font partie des activités scolaires. L’article présente les principales préoccupations environnementales de vingt villageois burkinabè sous les angles de la santé, du genre, de la politique et de l’éducation ainsi que les pistes de réflexion qu’ils proposent. À partir des témoignages des interviewés, les auteures survolent les questions de l’urbanisme, de l’eau, de la déforestation, de l’alimentation, des maladies, des conditions de vie des femmes, du transfert des connaissances, de la préservation des langues autochtones, de la hiérarchie, de la protection de l’environnement ainsi que du rôle de l’éducation à ces égards. This article examines the integration of a « conscience verte » (ecological sense) among primary level students who received two different types of schooling :-- bilingual and uniligual. Ten of those interviewed were from a unilingual school whose curriculum dates to the time of colonization, whereas ten other students went to a bilingual school where knowledge, savoir-faire, and indigenous languages are part of the scholarly activities. The article presents the principal environmental preoccupations of the 20 students from Burkina Faso regarding issues of health, gender, policy and education as well as their opinions on how to address them. According to the reports of those interviewed, the authors consider questions of urbanization, of water, deforestation, nutrition, illnesses, the living conditions of women, the transfer of knowledge, preservation of indigenous languages, hierarchies and protection of the environment as well as the role of education to address these issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".