Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1979 a research methods seminar for health professionals in Sierra Leone was conducted as part of an international medical education collaborative project between Sierra Leone, Canada, the United Kingdom and the European Economic Community. The aim of the seminar was to promote research and inquiry into national health problems. Planning and administration was conducted by Sierra Leone with Canada providing teaching materials and four tutors. Twenty-seven participants attended the seminar. Participants prepared research protocols prior to the seminar which they developed and refined during the 7 days of the workshop. Using a problem-based method Sierra Leonean health problems were used as the focus to teach epidemiological and biostatistical methods. The seminar was evaluated on the basis of a number of parameters. There was 89% attendance at the nineteen sessions. Twenty-one of the twenty-seven participants presented protocols at the final evaluation session. Self-evaluation of protocols showed improvement in most aspects but particularly in research design, methods of data gathering, analysis and ethical aspects. An opinion survey of participants showed the seminar to be viewed positively. Twelve months later six participants had submitted their protocols for funding of whom four were successful. A further seminar has been conducted in which Sierra Leoneans participated as co-tutors. This seminar format has been presented as an effective means of providing professional assistance from one country to another.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it