MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

10.1016/0967-0653(93)96192-g

2000· article· en· W611638441 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShetlandPetroleum industrySafeguardingResource (disambiguation)Statutory lawEnvironmental impact assessmentNorth seaEnvironmental pollutionEnvironmental protectionEconomyGeographyPolitical scienceEngineeringLawOceanographyEnvironmental engineeringEconomicsGeologyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Section 1 - Resource, environment and development (R G H Turnbull). Summary (R G H Turnbull). Resource (F G Larminie). Environment (A D McIntyre and R G H Turnbull). Development (B G S Taylor and R G H Turnbull). Section 2 - Economic and social impacts (H M Begg). Summary (H M Begg). Development of UK policy towards oil and gas impacts on the UK economy (A G Kemp). The impact of oil on the Scottish economy with particular reference to the Aberdeen economy (M G Lloyd and D A Newlands). Impact of large installations: oil platform fabrication yards in the highlands and islands (S H Picket). Oil and remote communities: Shetland and Orkney (G A Blackadder and J Baster). Some international comparisons (G A Mackay). Section 3 - Environmental impact - onshore (S G Fulton). Summary (S G Fulton). The central and local government responses to North Sea oil and gas developments in Scotland (R G H Turnbull and T F Sprott). Safeguarding the environmental interest (J M Francis, R Goodier and M P Ferguson). The Scottish approach to the environmental assessment (R G H Turnbull). Mitigation by design (W J Cairns). The response to industry: the Shetland oil terminal environmental advisory group (L V Kingham). Section 4 - Environmental impact - offshore (C S Johnston and J C Side). Summary (J C Side and C S Johnston). Environmental assessments. International initiatives and statutory controls on the prevention of pollution from offshore operations (A D Read and L O Reiersen). Sources of environmental disturbance associated with offshore oil and gas developments (J M Davies and P F Kingston). Oil spills - effects and response (B M Dicks and I C White). The impact on the fishing industry (F Buchan and R Allan). Submarine pipelines and the North Sea environment (D Haldane, R L Reuben and J C Side). Decommissioning and abandonment of offshore installations (J C Side). Section 5 - Hazard and risk (C G Ramsay). Summary (C G Ramsay). Hazard and risk (C G Ramsay and S Grant). Mossmorran case study (P E Day). The management of acute risks - oil spill contingency planning and response (D C Monk and D Cormack). Managing chronic environmental risks (H J Somerville and D Shirley).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9880.988

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.140
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it