MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W61206941 · doi:10.1017/s1539299600014313

First Results from the FUSE Mission

2002· article· en· W61206941 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Sonneborn, H. W. Moos

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights of Astronomy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsFuse (electrical)GalaxyAstronomyPhysicsSpectroscopyFar ultravioletSpectral resolutionUniverseAstrophysicsSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE) provides high-resolution spectroscopy at far ultraviolet (FUV) wavelengths (905–1187Å) of many astronomical objects in order to address fundamental questions related to the origin of the universe. FUSE, a cooperative project of the United States, Canada, and France, was launched in June 1999 for a three-year primary mission. The instrument sensitivity permits studies of many extragalactic sources at high spectral resolution. The key science drivers for the mission design are absorption-line spectroscopy of the ISM and IGM to investigate D/H, O VI, and molecular hydrogen abundances and distribution in the Galaxy and beyond to z ~ 0.3. Most of the observing time is available to Guest Investigators. This Joint Discussion summarizes some of the scientific results determined primarily from the first several months of FUSE observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights of AstronomySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207