MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W612153130

Detroit Reconstructs Interstate 75

2008· article· en· W612153130 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine A. Cardno

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)PedestrianTransport engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringGateway (web page)Highway systemForensic engineeringComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides a description of the renovation and update of Interstate 75 in Detroit, Michigan. Nearing the end of its design-life, the roadway is essential for Detroit commerce, as it connects the city to Canada via the Ambassador Bridge. The goals that the Michigan Department of Transportation has for the project include reunifying the surrounding neighborhood that has been bisected by the roadway using a pedestrian bridge, renovating 24 bridge structures associated with I-75, improving concrete roads and retaining walls, and improving bridge ramps. The pedestrian bridge is of particular importance as it will be the longest cable-stayed pedestrian bridge in Michigan at 400 feet in length. As the project will not involve any expansion of the current space taken by the freeway, earlier structures like freeway slopes will be removed to widen the roadway. The Gateway Project, as it is called, is projected to cost $170 million as part of a larger $250 million project in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil engineeringSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207