MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W612466476

Study on the Non-Constructive Land in Town Development and It's Governance/ETUDE SUR LA TERRE NON-CONSTRUCTIVE DANS LE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU BOURG ET SA GOUVERNANCE

2008· article· fr· W612466476 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Juan Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Design and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstructiveCorporate governanceFoundation (evidence)Balance (ability)GeographyRegional sciencePolitical scienceArchaeologyEconomicsManagementComputer scienceProcess (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article tried to do some research, on the foundation of the study with the governance of non-constuctive land in Chinas county territory to promote the balance of the region. Specifically, this paper reviews the necessity of research on town's non-constructive land and designs the system of non-constructive land. Finally, by analyzing the correlation of the construction land and the non-construction 1and, the paper expounds the methods of the governance for non-constuctive land in town development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207