Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the 2013 exhibition Through the Looking Glass: Inside My Domestic Portrait of Filipino Canadian artist Julius Poncelet Manapul. I ask in this case study: What are the ways in which Filipino Canadian artists mobilize art in response to their invisibility in Canadian society? Adopting a contextual analysis, I interpret Manapul’s artwork, my interview with the artist, and his writings and place them in conversation with discourses of contemporary art, visual culture, and cultural studies. I argue Manapul’s hybrid art practice represents an emerging queer decolonial aesthetic that challenges Western heteronormative standards of family, home, identity, and citizenship consequently creating a utopic, third space of potentiality. Through physical, symbolic, and virtual interventions, Manapul provides an alternative vision of postcolonial subjectivity, which defies essentialist readings of ethnic identity prevalent in Canada’s neoliberal multicultural discourse. I discuss the implications of Manapul’s queer decolonial aesthetic in relation to multiculturalism in Canada and its generative possibilities for contemporary queer theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".