MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W612507343

A Rabbi's Impression of the Oberammergau Passion Play.

2010· article· en· W612507343 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Carus

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionImpressionArtTheologyPsychologyPhilosophySocial psychologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rabbi's impression of the oberammergau passion PLAY.' How many thousands and even millions migrate at the end of every decade to Oberammergau to witness the famous Passion Play performed by the simple Ty- rolese peasantry of that retired village !It is a survival of former years, and we enjoy its performance as a remnant of the times in which Christian faith was more vigorous, less critical, and extraordinarily fervent.But those who go and enjoy the grand drama are mostly Christians, and look at the spectacle with sentiments which see nothing but nobility, greatness, and an elevation of mankind in the seve- ral scenes that are enacted before their eyes.How welcome should be the report of a man who, although friendly to Jesus of Nazareth, yet calls attention to a gross violation of justice done to the nation from which the hero of the Passion Play originated.Rabbi Krauskopf went to Oberammergau in the expectation of seeing the Pas- sion Play as one would be interested in any other performance, -a drama of Shake speare or of Goethe, or a performance of Hiawatha in Canada.But while he listened, the traveller turned theologian, the cosmopolitan, Jew.He felt the stinging reproaches against Judaism as directed against himself, and the nations that worship Jesus as a god revile the people to whom he belongs.The Romans have been exonerated from the crime of having executed an innocent man ; and the motive is obvious to the historian.When Christianity grew, it could succeed among Romans only by proving that it was not an anti-Roman religion.Thus, Jesus is represented as hostile to the Jews, and the Jews alone, a race offen- sive to the Romans, are made to bear the whole blame of the Crucifixion.Rabbi Krauskopf enters into details and shows how utterly impossible are some of the features of the story of the trial of Jesus.He claims that the story of the Jews having persecuted, betrayed, condemned, and crucified Jesus is histori- cally untrue, and the invention, partly of an excited imagination, partly of policy,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)Same topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207