Bibliographic record
Abstract
SPS wurde urspruenglich als Plattenverkleidung von Offshore-Konstruktionen sowie Arbeitsplattformen im kanadischen Beaufort-Meer zum Schutz von (Schiffs-)Anprall entwickelt. Innerhalb der vergangenen 13 Jahre wurden fuer SPS umfangreiche Untersuchungen zu Materialverhalten und -eigenschaften und Brandschutz durchgefuehrt sowie Bemessungsregeln fuer die Konstruktion entwickelt. Zudem wurden spezielle Verbindungsdetails entworfen und der Arbeitsablauf fuer Herstellung, Reparatur und Qualitaetsueberwachung optimiert - insbesondere fuer den Baustelleneinsatz bei SPS-Overlay-Massnahmen. Diese Arbeiten und Untersuchungen, die im vorliegenden Aufsatz vorgestellt werden, zeigen deutlich, dass sich mit SPS-Platten gleiche Tragfaehigkeiten wie mit konventionell versteiften Stahlplatten erzielen lassen, wobei bei gleichzeitiger Gewaehrleistung der Wirtschaftlichkeit eine Reihe weiterer Vorteile bei Leistungsfaehigkeit und Sicherheit erlangt werden koennen. (A) ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH: SPS was initially developed to provide impact resistant plating for offshore structures, ice islands, working in the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Research and development over the last thirteen years has focused on basic research into structural behaviour and performance, material characterization, fire resistance and fire engineering analyses, as well as development of design rules and energy absorption design philosophies. In addition connection details specific to sandwich plate structures and methods for in-situ installations (SPS Overlay), repair, prefabrication and inspection have been developed. The work summarized in this paper, clearly demonstrates that not only SPS plates can be designed to be structurally equivalent to stiffened steel plates, but that the implied economical use of SPS plates provides a number of further advantages with respect to performance and safety. (A)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".