Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Guide canadien de signalisation des voies cyclables expose des lignes directrices concernant l’installation de panneaux et de marques sur la chaussee des voies cyclables et presente des dessins et des dispositifs de signalisation typiques. Nombre des lignes directrices peuvent s’appliquer tant aux voies cyclables sur route qu’aux voies cyclables hors-route. Il convient toutefois de noter que le present document a pour but d’encadrer la signalisation des voies cyclables situees a l’interieur d’une emprise publique. Les panneaux et les marques sur la chaussee doivent etre concus avec soin et installes de maniere a en maximiser l’efficacite. Il importe que les organismes responsables de l’application des presentes lignes directrices fassent preuve d’un bon jugement technique et appliquent des principes judicieux lors de la mise en oeuvre des elements de signalisation des voies cyclables. Les presentes lignes directrices devraient evoluer au fil du temps, au gre des jugements techniques prudents, des experiences et des essais qui ne manqueront pas d’etre faits pour repondre aux besoins des cyclistes canadiens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".