Investigative reporting in Canada : case studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION PART ONE: TRACKING THE TRUTH: THE LITERATURE OF EXPOSURE 1. The Case of the Disappearing Women (Vancouver Sun, 2001) 2. Reinventing our Wheels (Ottawa Citizen/Vancouver Sun, 2001) 3. Death Wish: Humans and the Planet (Globe and Mail, 2001) 4. Asbestos, Again (Toronto Star, 2003) 5. Criminalizing Dissent (Ottawa Citizen and Southam News, 2001) 6. Dialling for Dollars (Toronto Star, 2002) 7. Tarnishing the Ivory Tower (Globe and Mail, 2001) 8. Blind Faith (Hamilton Spectator, 2005) PART TWO: DOCUMENTING THE TRUTH: COMPUTER ASSISTED REPORTING 9. Nowhere to Go (Toronto Star, 2001) 10. Nobody's Children (Toronto Star, 2001) 11. Recipe for disaster (Hamilton Spectator, 2001) 12. Drive Clean: Smokescreen (Hamilton Spectator, 2004) 13. Singled Out: Racial Profiling (Toronto Star, 2002) PART THREE: TALKING INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM 14. Conversations with Canadian journalists 15. Conclusions APPENDICES REFERENCES INDEX
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it