The public sociology debate : ethics and engagement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword / Michael Burawoy Introduction: Burawoy's Vision of Sociology / Ariane Hanemaayer and Christopher J. Schneider Part 1: Debating the Normative Dimensions of Professional Sociology 1 Returning to the Classics: Looking to Weber and Durkheim to Resolve the Theoretical Inconsistencies of Public Sociology / Ariane Hanemaayer 2 Public Sociology, Professional Sociology, and Democracy / Axel Van Den Berg Part 2: Critical Reflections on the Possibility of Public Sociology 3 L'Ouverture des bouches: The Social and Intellectual Bases for Engaged and Public Social Theory / Scott Schaffer 4 Precarious Publics: Interrogating a Public Sociology for Migrant Workers in Canada / Jill Bucklaschuk 5 Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Teaching Public Sociology / Susan Prentice Part 3: Blurring the Line between Policy and Public Sociology 6 Public Sociology and Research Ethics / Anne Mesny 7 Coral W. Topping, Pioneer Canadian Public Sociologist: A Veteran Warrior for Prison Reform / Rick Helmes-Hayes Part 4: Innovative Engagements in Public Scholarship 8 Social Media and e-Public Sociology / Christopher J. Schneider 9 Public Ethnography as Public Engagement: Multimodal Pedagogies for Innovative Learning / Phillip Vannini and Laura Milne Conclusion / Ariane Hanemaayer and Christopher J. Schneider Epilogue: Student Reflections on a Public Sociology Course at UBC, Okanagan Campus / Kyle Nolan Appendix 1: Theory and Practice of Sociology Syllabus, University of Manitoba Appendix 2: Public Sociology Syllabus, UBC, Okanagan Campus Contributors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.024 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.017 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".