MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W613856058

PS 3150: Implications for Infrastructure Valuation, Accounting, and Management

2007· article· en· W613856058 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLife Cycle Costing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValuation (finance)AmortizationBusinessAccountingIntangible assetBook valuePre-money valuationValuation effectsEarnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortizationFinanceAsset managementEconomicsDebtEarnings
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) introduced PS 3150 Tangible Capital Asset to encourage the valuation and amortization of long-lived municipal infrastructure. Although based on a historic cost valuation method, PS 3150 is intended as a first step to support appropriate accounting and management of infrastructure assets. In this paper, the authors briefly discuss the broad aim of asset valuation, the basic approach of PS 3150 in this regard, and two case studies intended to illustrate the valuation and amortization method advocated in PS 3150. The authors are careful to distinguish between the needs of financial accountants, on the one hand, and financial managers, on the other hand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLife Cycle Costing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207