MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W61392194

Magi and Angels: Charms in Plimpton Add. MS 02

2013· article· en· W61392194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marjorie Harrington

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Early Book Society for the Study of Manuscripts and Printing History · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFifteenthMiscellanyAlchemyArtDivinationMAGIC (telescope)Quarter (Canadian coin)LiteratureMiddle AgesHistoryClassicsArt historyAncient historyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the frequent victims in the study of medieval magic is the field of popular charms. Where textual evidence of them survives at all, it is almost never in the large, elaborately illuminated volumes where, for example, treatises on alchemy and divination are often found, but in small, well-worn codices or scraps of paper, or else noted in the margins and on the flyleaves of other texts. These are exactly the manuscripts that are usually overlooked by art historians or other scholars interested in codicological matters, and for this reason, many--especially those dating from the last centuries of the Middle Ages, lacking even antiquity's appeal--have been neglected. Among these, Plimpton Add. MS 02 (henceforth Plimpton) holds a remarkable, previously undiscovered series of charms. Plimpton is a small, unprepossessing late-fifteenth-century miscellany in the Rare Books and Manuscript Library at Columbia University. (1) Physically, Plimpton is composed of six leaves of poor-quality parchment: two bifolia followed by two more leaves of uncertain construction. Some appear to have been scraped for reuse, and each is only about two and a half inches wide and six and a quarter inches tall. The upper edges of all leaves have been badly damaged, possibly by fire or smoke. At some later point, the manuscript was bound among twenty-five paper folia in a nineteenth-century English brown calf binding. The text is written in two roughly contemporary Gothic book hands dated by Malcolm Parkes to the final quarter of the fifteenth century. (2) The texts in the first scribe's hand, which this paper is most concerned with, are a collection of writings in honor of the Three Magi, namely the vespers antiphon for the feast of Epiphany, an extract from Psalm 71, and a prayer for guidance for travelers, followed by a collection of eight brief charms addressed to various angels, with instructions for their performance, a concluding prayer, and a list of sacred names. Following these, the second scribe adds a collection of Middle English hunting terms and proverbial material. Little scholarship has been done on Plimpton to date. After its description by C. U. Bond and W. H. Faye in the 1962 Supplement to the de Ricci Census, (3), in 1967 Rachel Hands established that the material contained in folios 3r-5v of Plimpton--lists of collective nouns, moral precepts, terms of resting and mating, carving terms, four items that a wise man ought to fear, and fifteen properties of a good horse--is an abridged copy of National Library of Wales Brogyntyn MS ii.1 (olim Porkington 10), folios 184r-192v, (4) a claim she repeats in her later facsimile of the Boke of St. Albans. (5), In 1999, Paul Acker noted that following the portion of Plimpton copied from the Brogyntyn MS are two Middle English devotional lyrics, Lord that art of mi3tis moste (6) and Almytty God Ihesu Crist, (7) and published a transcription of the latter. (8) No other research has been published on Plimpton; most notably, the material on folios lv-2v (fol. 1r is blank) has been entirely ignored, with the sole exception of a footnote by Acker that labels it Latin prayers (or charms) to the Three Magi and guardian angels without further discussion. (9) This paper attempts to address that gap in the scholarship, beginning by examining Plimpton's physical form and textual content, moving to an analysis of several of the texts included in Plimpton within the context of medieval folk magic, and concluding that these entries are examples of religious charms. Finally, I argue that Plimpton's unusual pattern of folding and wear suggests that it was used as a textual amulet. Physical Features The poor quality of the parchment in Plimpton, its small size, and its idiosyncratic contents suggest that it could have been originally intended as a gathering for a commonplace book. (10) As described by David Parker, the most distinctive feature of commonplace books, and a notable characteristic of Plimpton, is the personal selection and combination of texts, the arrangement of which allows compilers to become authors of a sort. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Early Book Society for the Study of Manuscripts and Printing HistorySame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207