Sportization and hazing : global sport culture and the differentiation of initiation from harassment in Canada's sport policy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study argues against the current Canadian amateur sport policy position that the policy term initiation rite is interchangeable with hazing, which is synonymous to harassment and abuse.Specifically, it proposes a new theory -Rites Theory -which differentiates and reconceptualizedthese terms to base new policy on.In an attempt to establish the legitimacy of the Rites Theory and to allow those who sport policy is directed at to have input, a study of provincial elite athletes in Manitoba was conducted.The findings show that despite the current zero tolerunt harassment and abuse policy athletes still participate in rite activities.Policy recommendations reflect the attitude of athletes that initiation rites can consist of positive and negative activities.Recommendations also take into account avery important factor, sportization.For any Canadian sport policy to be effective, policy makers have to acknowledge the existence of a global sport culture and the international level, and the actors within it, of the Canadian sport delivery system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it