Remembering 1759: the conquest of Canada in historical memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents Preface Contributors I Introduction II 'The Immortal Wolfe'?: Monuments, Memory, and the Battle of Quebec III 'Where Famous Heroes Fell': Tourism, History, and Liberalism in Old Quebec IV In Search of the Plains of Abraham: British, American, and Canadian Views of a Symbolic Landscape, 1793-1913 V History, Historiography, and the Courts: The St. Lawrence Mission Villages and the Fall of New France VI Interpreting the Past, Shaping the Present, and Envisioning the Future: Remembering the Conquest in Nineteenth-Century Quebec VII Overcoming a National 'Catastrophe': The British Conquest in the Historical and Polemical Thought of Abbe Lionel Groulx VIII Intervening with abandon: The Conquest's Legacy in the Canada-Quebec-France Triangle of the 1960s IX A Nightmare to Awaken From: The Conquest in the Thinking of Quebecois Nationalists of the 1960s and After X Below the Academic Radar: Denis Vaugeois and Constructing the Conquest in the Quebec Popular Imagination XI Remembering the Conquest: Mission Impossible? XII What is to be Done with 1759?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".