MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W614786291

大豆花粉管通道技术转化雪花莲凝集素(GNA)基因

2006· article· zh· W614786291 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
刘德璞, 袁鹰, Kexuan Tang, 郑培和, 王兴智, 刘宝, 周正平, 姜昱, 孙小芬, 肖乃仲

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2006
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

采用花粉管通道技术,用雪花莲凝集素基因(Galanthus nivalis agglutinin,GNA)转化吉林省主推品种吉林20号、吉林30号、吉林45号品种大豆。通过接蚜鉴定和PCR鉴定,从所获得的种子苗中筛选出转基因植株。对转基因植株的后代进行分子生物学鉴定:(1)PCR分析,转基因植株97TGR1和97TGR2的T2代表现阳性,第5代表现阳性纯合;97TGR1、97TGR2和98FD1~98FD20的T3代Western blotting检测结果证明,GNA基因在蛋白质水平有表达,最高表达量占总可溶性蛋白的0.7%;97TGR1、98TGR2和99JI45 TGR2的Southern blotting检测结果显示,GNA基因已插入大豆基因组;(2)遗传学分析,97TRG1的T2代呈孟德尔3:1分离,97TGR2的T3代出现种皮颜色不规则分离。经过抗蚜性鉴定和连续的筛选,获得抗性纯系;(3)抗蚜性鉴定,转基因株的T1、T2世代转基因植株可抑制蚜虫繁殖量50%~90%;(4)品系鉴定,转基因大豆的抗蚜性达到农学标准抗(R)和高抗(HR)水平;大面积环境释放试验自然感蚜鉴定,转基因系蚜虫发生的高峰比对照延迟,高峰期过后群体蚜量的下降速度也比对照快。本研究认为,大豆花粉管通道技术可以利用于大豆的转基因研究和应用中,GNA基因在改良大豆的抗蚜性上是可取的。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207