Moving more with less: integrated transportation demand management at the University of British Columbia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The University of British Columbia (UBC) is in a geographically isolated area away from the downtown core of Vancouver. With an average growth rate of 2 per cent per year and an aggressive neighbourhood development plan, this has encouraged UBC to take a proactive approach in developing strategies to pursue sustainable transportation targets aimed at reducing single occupancy vehicle traffic, while increasing transit ridership and other alternative mode choices To this end, in partnership with the Greater Vancouver Regional District, an official community plan was developed in 1997, with the intent to help guide all future campus growth and development in accordance with the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD)s Livable Region Strategic Plan (LRSP). The LRSP is the GVRD's regional growth strategy aimed at maintaining regional livability and protection of environment in the face of anticipated growth. All levels of government use the LRSP as the framework for making regional land use and transportation decisions. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E216058.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it