Out of the Shadows: The Global Intensification of Supplementary Education
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Researching supplementary education: Plans, realities, and lessons from fieldwork in china. The insecurity industry: Supplementary education in Japan. Supplementary education in turkey: Recent developments and future prospects. Private tutoring in vietnam: A review of current issues and its major correlates. Supplementary education in brazil: Diversity and paradoxes. Supplementary education in a changing organizational field: The canadian case. But did it help you get to university? A qualitative study of supplementary education in western australia. Supplementary education in the United States: Policy context, characteristics, and challenges. Supplementary education in germany: History and present developments. Making markets: Policy construction of supplementary education in the united states and korea. Family capital: A determinant of supplementary education in 17 nations. Out of the Shadows: The Global Intensification of Supplementary Education. International Perspectives on Education and Society. Out of the Shadows: The Global Intensification of Supplementary Education. Copyright page. List of Contributors. Foreword. Out of the shadows? An introduction to worldwide supplementary education. About the Authors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it