MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W617291485

Geography and Genealogy: Locating Personal Pasts

2008· book· en· W617291485 on OpenAlexaff
Jeanne Kay Guelke, Dallen J. Timothy

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Entomology and Zoology · 2008
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenealogyHistorical geographyGeographyCultural geographyFamily treeToponymyTourismCartographyArt historyHistoryAnthropologyHuman geographySociologyArchaeologyEconomic geography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents: Locating personal pasts: an introduction, Jeanne Kay Guelke and Dallen J. Timothy Part I Tools, Sources, and Implications for Geography and Family History: The unfolding tale of using maps in genealogical research, Melinda Kashuba Genealogy, historical geography, and GIS: parcel mapping, information synergies, and collaborative opportunities, Mary B. Ruvane and G. Rebecca Dobbs A genealogy of environmental impact assessment, William Hunter Knitting the Transatlantic bond: one woman's letters to America, 1860a 1910, Penny L. Richards Remaking time and space: the internet, digital archives and genealogy, Kevin Meethan. Part II Genealogy as a Cultural Practice: Genealogical mobility: tourism and the search for a personal past, Dallen J. Timothy Genealogy as religious ritual: the doctrine and practice of family history in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Samuel M. Otterstrom Genetics, genealogy and geography, David C. Mountain and Jeanne Kay Guelke Conclusion: personal perspectives, Dallen J. Timothy and Jeanne Kay Guelke Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Entomology and ZoologySame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207