MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W618962613

Retirement in a Defined Contribution Era: Making the Money Last, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1091 (2008)

2008· article· en· W618962613 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Pratt

Bibliographic record

VenueUIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPensionPovertySocial securityAnnuityPoverty rateQuarter (Canadian coin)Demographic economicsEconomicsPoor peoplePoverty levelDemographyEconomic growthGeographySociologyFinanceLife annuity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

available at www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/AC_1114 01_report.html(quoting Sylvester Schieber, "In considering how to increase coverage and participation, we must focus on the type of plan to which our culture has driven us-401(k) plans-and quit beating our heads against a wall trying to bring back the "good old days" of the DB plan").3. "The percentage of people 65 and older receiving income from pensions rose until the early 1990s, peaking at 38% in 1992.The proportion of the elderly population receiving pension income has since fallen slightly.In 2004, 36% of people 65 and older received pension income."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)Same topicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFrench-language works237,207