MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W619393122 · doi:10.1179/pan.2012.026

A New Look at the Besant Phase in the Eastern Slopes of the Canadian Rocky Mountains

2012· article· en· W619393122 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sheila Greaves

Bibliographic record

VenuePlains Anthropologist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoothillsProjectile pointArchaeologyGeologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Besant phase is a Late Middle Precontact culture lasting from ca. 2,200 to 1,200 years ago, and found throughout the northern Plains region. Although sites attributed to the Besant phase have been recorded in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains in Alberta since the 1960s, its presence there is not well understood. The conventional view of the Besant phase in Alberta is that it appears rarely in the Eastern Slopes, where it is confined to the foothills of the southern drainages. However, this model does not account for the growing number of sites found elsewhere in the Canadian Rocky Mountains over the last three decades. The present research uses a regional approach to document all known locations of Besant projectile points and sites recorded in the Eastern Slopes of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Archaeological data indicating that people affiliated with the Besant phase used the Eastern Slopes from the foothills to the main ranges, and from the Waterton River drainage to the Smoky River drainage are presented and evaluated. The results expand our understanding of the Besant culture and its adaptation to mountain regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlains AnthropologistSame topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207