School Shootings: Mediatized Violence in a Global Age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2012), "School Shootings: Mediatized Violence in a Global Age", Muschert, G.W. and Sumiala, J. (Ed.) School Shootings: Mediatized Violence in a Global Age (Studies in Media and Communications, Vol. 7), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. i. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-2060(2012)0000007022 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters School Shootings: Mediatized Violence in a Global Age Studies in Media and Communications Studies in Media and Communications Copyright Page List of Contributors Preface Introduction: School Shootings as Mediatized Violence School Shootings and Cultivation Analysis: On Confrontational Media Rhetoric and the History of Research on the Politics of Media Violence Media Dynamics in School Shootings: A Socialization Theory Perspective A Futile Game: On the Prevalence and Causes of Misguided Speculation about the Role of Violent Video Games in Mass School Shootings Media Consumption in German School Shooters Making Headlines: A Quarter Century of the Media's Characterization of Canadian School Shootings Analyzing Visual Media Coverage of Amok School Shootings – A Novel Iconographic Approach U.S. and Finnish Journalists: A Comparative Study of Roles, Responsibilities, and Emotional Reactions to School Shootings Vital Explanations or Harmful Gossip? Finnish Journalists’ Reflections on Reporting the Interpretations of Two School Shootings Deciphering Rampage: Assigning blame to Youth Offenders in News Coverage of School Shootings Media Participation of School Shooters and their Fans: Navigating between Self-Distinction and Imitation to Achieve Individuation The Remote is Controlled by the Monster: Issues of Mediatized Violence and School Shootings The Mediatized Victim: School Shootings as Distant Suffering Collective Coping through Networked Narratives: YouTube Responses to the Virginia Tech Shooting School Shootings, Crises of Masculinities, and Media Spectacle: Some Critical Perspectives Afterword: Is Mediatization a Useful Concept for Informing Practice in Journalism? Afterword: Media and School Shootings: A Sociological View About the Authors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".