Scona Road Case Study: Challenges and Opportunities for the Widening of an Existing Major Arterial into the City of Edmonton's Downtown Core
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scona Road is a major urban arterial roadway which leads to one of six river crossings into Edmonton's downtown core. In 2011, the roadway underwent a full reconstruction as well as the addition of a new lane to address the existing congestion levels and safety issues which occurred as a result of vehicles attempting a merge onto Scona Road from a major arterial. A new lane was required to provide a free-flow movement for vehicles leaving the downtown. This paper discusses the City of Edmonton's experience with the design and construction to accommodate the new alignment. A major challenge the design encountered was fully accommodating all existing adjacent property users. The west side of the roadway is adjacent to Edmonton's environmentally sensitive river valley. A detailed review was undertaken in an effort to best balance out the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, river valley users, commuters and the adjacent community. The conflicting requirements of the numerous stakeholders could not all be met within the restrictive right of way. The intent of the report is to provide readers with an insight to an urban widening project and discuss not only the challenges but possible solutions to a topic which numerous Canadian municipalities face: What are the options and implications for widening a roadway in a fully developed and environmentally sensitive area? (A) For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201211RT334E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".